Louis
Posts: 6436
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
Well I'm not as sanguine about it as you are, I thought it verged on the bloody awful.
They gave VASTLY too much time to the IDCist nonsense and presented it as plausible. Dawkins and the Kitzmiller decisions were almost inserted as afterthoughts, Miller came off well however.
What really annoyed me was the pish poor journalism. This was presented as a dramatic clash between faith and science. ID was built up as a reasonable scienctific project as opposed to the vile religious calumny it is. The tiny bright light is that they never showed ID as being anything other than religious.
Poxy BBC and their religious agenda! I'm writing in, later on when I am less incandescent and more coherent.
Louis
--------------
Bye.
|
