RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Jan. 18 2019,08:48   

Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 18 2019,16:44)
Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 17 2019,23:21)
Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 18 2019,05:17)
 
Quote
The usual sequence is science shows how something Behe claims is IC can evolve, then Behe just says that only means it wasn’t IC to begin with and moves the goalposts to the next claimed IC thing. He’s been playing this intellectual whack-a-mole game for years.


LIAR. You are a pathetic lying bitch, timmy. Science has never shown how anything IC can evolve by means of natural selection, drift or any other blind and mindless process. Science doesn't even know how to test the claim.

If I didn't read the shit that you spew I could never believe such a pathetic lying bitch existed.


In other news JoeG Meltdown Index(JMI) reaches maximum  ever for post Dover crying.

What crying? I still have science and reality on my side:

The Court’s reasoning in section E-4 is premised on: a cramped view of science; the conflation of intelligent design with creationism; an incapacity to distinguish the implications of a theory from the theory itself; a failure to differentiate evolution from Darwinism; and strawman arguments against ID. The Court has accepted the most tendentious and shopworn excuses for Darwinism with great charity and impatiently dismissed evidence-based arguments for design.  

All of that is regrettable, but in the end does not impact the realities of biology, which are not amenable to adjudication. On the day after the judge’s opinion, December 21, 2005, as before, the cell is run by amazingly complex, functional machinery that in any other context would immediately be recognized as designed.  On December 21, 2005, as before, there are no non-design explanations for the molecular machinery of life, only wishful speculations and Just-So stories.


Only willfully ignorant evoTARDs think that science can be determined by a Court of law.

Under educated lying liar creationist JoeG denies Science by SHOUTING.

What's next?

Shutting down the Gubment?

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]