Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 30 2018,09:52) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 30 2018,17:50) | | Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Mar. 30 2018,09:47) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 30 2018,08:32) | | Quote (Tony M Nyphot @ Mar. 30 2018,09:25) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 30 2018,08:03) | | By the way, moron, peak to peak refers to amplitude and not wavelength. |
What a moronic dumbass our own little obese toaster repairman is. |
Here you go you ignorant asshole:
peak to peak
Peak-to-peak (pk-pk) is the difference between the maximum positive and the maximum negative amplitudes of a waveform, as shown below. |
As your link notes, it is the difference between the positive and negative amplitudes, not the amplitude itself. |
Whatever. It definitely does NOT refer to wavelength as ke said |
BUT BUT BUT Joe you said frequency = wavelength so it must be right ....... RIGHT????? |
I supported my claim. You choked on it
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
