Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 30 2018,08:41) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 29 2018,16:51) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 28 2018,23:06) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 28 2018,20:47) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 28 2018,11:46) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 28 2018,18:44) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 28 2018,10:31) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 28 2018,17:51) | | Joke extends his epic meltdown / attention whoring streak another day. |
Haha ........ just wait until I post the link where he first wrote frequency=wavelength.
And where bozo Joe screwdriver monkey says you can see a wave on an oscilloscope. He didn't say how he caught the wave before he gave it to his oscilloscope, maybe with an ass hat. At least then he could measure time with a tape measure.
That should bring on another 3 year meltdown. |
Do it. Then everyone can see the context and they will know that you are an ignorant and desperate asshole.
How did I catch the wave? I put my 'scope probe on the TX output, duh. |
1. Joe a few pages ago on this blog you said "For the record I never posted frequency=wavelength" Do you stand by that statement? (You might like to ask your lawyer if you are a hostile witness)
2. What "wave" do you see on the output of your "TX"?
(If you actually have a "TX" and an "oscilloscope probe" is it long enough to measure 160 meters?) |
Yes I do. I never just posted "frequency = wavelength".
The wave I see on my TX is whatever wave I am transmitting from my signal generator. And my 'scope adjusts such that my 10x probe easily captures a 160 meter wave. |
1. So that's a 100% denial Joe? If so and if it pleases the blog I would like the blog to let me cross examine the witness's crediblity.
2. What exactly are you capturing with your "probe" Joe. |
1- So that is 100% ignorance for you, ke? If it please Uranus you can pull your head out of your ass and buy a vowel
2- I am capturing the signal with my probe. What are you capturing with your ignorance? |
Joe try to forget about getting your ass kicked with Dendrochronological facts for a few seconds and focus on what really matters as far as your crediblity is concerned. Your own blog records the equation written by you where you state that frequency = wavelength. But let's just say that we ignore that for a period of time and get back to your o'silliscope where you have a wave on the screen.
Now from peak to peak of your near enough to 2MHz signal you are measuring about 160 meters? Is that correct? |
What? Only a complete ignoramus thinks that I am getting my assed kicked on tree rings.
And yes frequency and wavelength are interchangeable under certain contexts.
By the way, moron, peak to peak refers to amplitude and not wavelength.
Grow up, get an education and then come back when you have something to say.
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
