k.e..
Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007
|
| Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:53) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:52) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:50) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Mar. 20 2018,09:49) | | Quote (Joe G @ Mar. 20 2018,17:45) | | I provided references that demonstrate the two are INTERCHANGEABLE in certain contexts. And anyone who isn't a total moron could easily see the context cited is the same as the context used, ie you can talk about the wavelength or the frequency but you are still talking about a species of infrared. 6 of one/ half dozen of the other. Different numerical representations of the same wave. |
A reference as you well know must be valid and pertinant.
What you have provided is a regulatory guide for the use of the Amateur radio bands which do not carry any reference to the relationship between frequency and wavelenght.
ASYOUWELLKNOWCOCKFACEDICKMOUTH |
The reference I provided is valid and pertinent. And it does show the relationship between frequency and wavelength. It shows that the two are interchangeable in certain contexts. |
Peer review anyone? |
OK let's see your peer-review that refutes my claim. Or shut the fuck up. |
Joe THIS IS your peer review.
Care to give yourself a score out 10?
Keep in mind that should include an honest *giggle* score from all the other successfull posts on other blogs.
--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin
|
