Richardthughes
Posts: 11178
Joined: Jan. 2006
|
| Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:40) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:38) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:36) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:34) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:32) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:26) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:18) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:09) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:06) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,11:02) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,11:00) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:58) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:51) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:49) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,10:46) | | Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Feb. 24 2018,10:44) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,07:54) | | I never said all experiments support ID. |
| Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 23 2018,04:57) | | all experiments and observations support baraminology |
What evidence supports baraminology and not ID Chubs?
If all the evidence and observations supports baraminology why isn't the DI and all the IDiots like you supportinging baraminology?
Oh, that's right. You are a YEC. :D |
The experiments allow for evolution by means of blind and mindless processes |
How do those experiments support baraminology Chubs?
Put down your Krispy Kreme and answer the question. |
Already answered, assface. They all show there are severe limits to evolutionary processes. And nothing shows Common Descent is possible. |
What experiment shows a limit to evolutionary processes Chubs? What is the physical mechanism of that limit?
You're long on YEC bluster but woefully short on positive evidence. |
All experiments do, asshole. And don't talk about positive evidence, loser. Your position doesn't have any.
What limits evolutionary change? Genetics. Heck you and yours don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. Yours is a complete non-starter |
"All experiments do" yet assface Joke Gallien can't name a single one! :D |
Lenski's experiment, for starters. And again all means all. Look them up and stop being such a willfully ignorant ass |
Lenski's experiments didn't show any genetic limits to change Joke.
Driving a car for 1 mile isn't evidence a car can't drive 100 miles over time.
Chubs fails again. :D |
Wow, bacteria remaining bacteria is evidence for limited change. No new proteins. No new protein machines. All very limited. |
Sorry assface Joke there was no genetic limit shown. The results of an extremely small 30 year experiment don't show any limits to what life can do over close to 4 billion years.
Chubby moron fails again. |
Of course it shows there are limits. There isn't anything that would demonstrate bacteria can ever be anything but bacteria. You don't have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. |
Sorry Joke, there was no genetic limit identified. But like all ID-Creationists you have to lie about other experiments since you clowns don't do any of your own.
Where can I read about ID baraminolgy Chubs? |
Yes, you are sorry. Not only that you don't have any positive evidence. You don't even have a mechanism capable of producing eukaryotes. You lose.
There aren't any micro-evolutionary events that can be extrapolated into macro-evolution. Not one. |
You were supposed to be showing how all experiments and observation support ID baraminology.
You can't because it's an incredibly stupid claim even by your low standards.
Joke Gallien the YEC fails again. :D |
Look them up, loser. Do your own research for once. Try to find one experiment that shows Common Descent is true. I know that you cannot. |
ID as a negative argument vol: 4549
Do you think science proves things true?
--------------
"Richardthughes, you magnificent bastard, I stand in awe of you..." : Arden Chatfield
"You magnificent bastard! " : Louis
"ATBC poster child", "I have to agree with Rich.." : DaveTard
"I bow to your superior skills" : deadman_932
"...it was Richardthughes making me lie in bed.." : Kristine
|
