RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (919) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Joe G.'s Tardgasm, How long can it last?< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
k.e..



Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 24 2018,10:43   

Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:39)
Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:34)
 
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:16)
 
Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,10:08)
   
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,18:00)
   
Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:57)
     
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:53)
     
Quote (k.e.. @ Feb. 24 2018,09:48)
       
Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 24 2018,17:43)
Why weren't those Dover school board members charged with perjury?

You know that would prove god doesn't exist....fool.

Really? That you think so just exposes your desperation.

Whine away joe. If you were really serious you would set up a fund to re-litigate  Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.

You think you can win go for it or STFU.

Fuck you, loser. You can't support evolutionism. You don't have any science to support your position. You are just an ignorant asshole on an agenda.

No one cares about Dover, dickhead. Well evoTARDs do but they don't care about facts and truths.

There will be more Court cases and seeing that we have learned evoTARD tactics those tactics will be useless next time.

ID lost Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District in 2004 ....so when can we expect the next big ID loss joe? 2024 2050?

ID has never lost so what do you mean by "next"? When will anyone discover any evidence to support the claims of evolutionism?

 
Quote
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. A declaratory judgment is hereby issued in favor of Plaintiffs pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 such that
Defendants’ ID Policy violates the Establishment Clause of the First
Amendment of the Constitution of the United States and Art. I, § 3 of
the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
2. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, Defendants are permanently enjoined
from maintaining the ID Policy in any school within the Dover Area
School District.
3. Because Plaintiffs seek nominal damages, Plaintiffs shall file with the
Court and serve on Defendants, their claim for damages and a verified
statement of any fees and/or costs to which they claim entitlement.
Defendants shall have the right to object to any such fees and costs to
the extent provided in the applicable statutes and court rules.
s/John E. Jones III
John E. Jones III
United States District Judge


Plus the Dover school board paid over $1,000,000 to the Plaintiffs for legal costs as ordered by the court.

If that's not losing joe then you are batshit crazy.

ID doesn't have anything to do with religion so it clearly does not violate the establishment clause. However evolutionism promotes atheism and as such does violate the establishment clause.

On the contrary a court has found ID does violate the establishment clause and no court has found that the Scientific Theory of Evolution does.

The conclusion here must be that joe is a moron.

--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin

  
  27552 replies since Feb. 24 2010,12:00 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (919) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]