k.e..
Posts: 5432
Joined: May 2007
|
| Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 05 2018,04:44) | | Quote (k.e.. @ Jan. 04 2018,20:42) | | Quote (Joe G @ Jan. 05 2018,04:40) | Linnaean Taxonomy is an objective nested hierarchy and it doesn't have anything to do with branching evolutionary processes. Corporations can be placed in objective nested hierarchies and again they have nothing to do with branching evolutionary processes. The US Army is a nested hierarchy and it too has nothing to do with branching evolutionary processes.
Fact and it proves Theobald is wrong
TRANSITIONAL FORMs have combined characteristics of different nested groups, Dougy. And your position expects numerous transitional forms.
Another fact that even Darwin acknowledged. Denton goes over this in "Evolution: A Theory in Crisis"
Nested hierarchies require distinct and distinguished groups-
Fact
So only if facts and proving the opposition wrong are called special pleading could my post be considered special pleading. |
AND yet NOTHING on PubMed to support your special pleading. |
There isn't anything but your ignorance to suggest any sort of special pleading on my part. There isn't anything in PubMed that supports evolution by means of blind and mindless processes. |
Then why are there over 500,000 papers on PubMed that reference evolution?
Your SPECIAL PLEADING is duly noted.
--------------
"I get a strong breeze from my monitor every time k.e. puts on his clown DaveTard suit" dogdidit
"ID is deader than Lenny Flanks granmaws dildo batteries" Erasmus
"I'm busy studying scientist level science papers" Galloping Gary Gaulin
|
