Wesley R. Elsberry
Posts: 4991
Joined: May 2002
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 30 2017,17:06) | | Quote (Wesley R. Elsberry @ Oct. 30 2017,07:34) | | Last time I looked, there was nothing remotely "neural" in Gary's code, and Gary specifically disavowed actually needing to do anything that would be an actual implementation of a neural network. |
Wesley has been complaining because I used the "Machine Intelligence" methodology I learned from David Heiserman, instead of the "Artificial Intelligence" neural network modeling technique that has since led others down a long road to the dead end I already knew about (from long ago having reached it that way too). This exactly:
www.businessinsider.com/facebooks-ai-boss-in-terms-of-general-intelligence-were-not-even-close-to-a-rat-2017-10/?r=US&IR=T
I'm none the less successfully modeling the behavior of populations of neurons, while my critics just throw defamatory insults. |
Again, animations are not themselves research. A system using operational processes different from the system of interest cannot be claimed to be anything more than an animation. And I'll note that Gary's summary of my complaints is false. Any review of the thread will show that I complained that Gary was using the reputation of Trehub to say that his PSC code was beyond criticism, yet Gary did not have any trace of Trehub neural models in his code.
I haven't said anything defamatory; I have made true observations and have plainly stated my opinions. Is Gary bugging Casey again?
--------------
"You can't teach an old dogma new tricks." - Dorothy Parker
|
