RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Nov. 18 2016,18:46   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 18 2016,19:21)
Quote (Texas Teach @ Nov. 18 2016,05:42)
 
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Nov. 17 2016,22:46)
 
Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 17 2016,19:58)
   
Quote
That's more like it. You do need much more than that simple illustration to show what went where.

That "simple" illustration (actually, it's not that simple) shows quite adequately why your initial assertions are wrong.  If it's that simple, how come you don't understand it?

You only helped prove my point that it's not as simple as you have been making it seem by making both chimp "cousins" who are neatly out on a branch of their own.

Gary, this is stuff we teach in school.  No one is hiding the information from you.  Try learning something before shooting your mouth off.

If you know so much then you should be able to spot what is (according to N.Wells) wrong in this:
 
Quote (N.Wells @ Nov. 17 2016,17:42)

How Science sums up the Prufer study:
http://www.sciencemag.org/news.......latives
       
Quote
When the Max Planck scientists compared the bonobo genome directly with that of chimps and humans, however, they found that a small bit of our DNA, about 1.6%, is shared with only the bonobo, but not chimpanzees. And we share about the same amount of our DNA with only chimps, but not bonobos. These differences suggest that the ancestral population of apes that gave rise to humans, chimps, and bonobos was quite large and diverse genetically—numbering about 27,000 breeding individuals. Once the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago, the common ancestor of bonobos and chimps retained this diversity until their population completely split into two groups 1 million years ago. The groups that evolved into bonobos, chimps, and humans all retained slightly different subsets of this ancestral population's diverse gene pool—and those differences now offer clues today to the size and range of diversity in that ancestral group.


That's pretty dishonest.

Gary, everyone here understands this better than you.  No one other than you is having any trouble with the concepts or the evidence.
You don't have to keep trying to prove it.
If you can't keep up, keep quiet.

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]