'Rev Dr' Lenny Flank
Unregistered
|
<quote>The standards do NOT call for teaching ID.</quote>
Riiiggghhhhttttt.
They just call for teaching all the ID arguments, presented by all the IDers.
Prove me wrong, right here in front of everyone. Show us what "scientific criticism of evolution" the standards want taught, that was NOT first presented by IDers or creation 'scientists" decades ago. . . . .
(sound of crickets chirping)
Yep, that's what I thought.
But I'm a little curious ---- if this REALLY isn't about ID, then, uh, what was this "theort of intelligent design" that all the, uh, "witnesses" at the, uh, "hearings", kept talking about? Oh, and why so many of the, uh, "witnesses" advocated a young earth, separate ancestry for man and apes, and sudden creation of life from nothing ---- all of which were defining characteristics of creation 'science'?
I'd also like to know if you agree with board member Kathy Martin, who told the press, ""Of course this is a Christian agenda. We are a Christian nation. Our country is made up of Christian conservatives. We don't often speak up, but we need to stand up and let our voices be heard." That sure doesn't sound like "scientific criticism of evolution" to ME.
I can't WAIT for this whole thing to get to court. It'll be Dover all over again, only worse this time. (snicker)
|
