NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ June 29 2016,23:55) | ...
Gary can refute this by showing how he, personally, through visual testing, refuted his early-childhood hypothesis that the earth was stationary.[/quote]
For as far back as I can recall what is "stationary" has always been relative. Relative to us planet Earth is a stationary object we walk on. Its rotation became most clear by through a telescope looking at things move by, caused by our planet revolving once each day.
I have no memory at all of a hypothesis that the earth was stationary. The best I have is a magic moment in my childhood that was caused by the information in moving inside a car through a long field with train and telephone poles that appeared to be moving funny. Sorting out what was moving relative to the other almost made perfect sense. |
So, no trace of a hypothesis, no trace of testing or validating or attempting to falsify, no gathering of data, no development of a general theory.
Indeed, nothing whatsoever about your little anecdote matches up to anything whatsoever in your nice little diagram.
Nice way to refute your own latest diagram, and on the very page on which you present it.
You're a piss-poor modeler Gary. Probably because you're a piss-poor thinker, observer, analyzer, etc.
|
