Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
| Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ May 17 2016,11:17) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ May 17 2016,11:15) | | Quote | NewsMay 17, 2016 at 10:03 am
inquisitor at 103, you write
By that logic, the Westborro Babtist church, the KKK, the Salem witch hunters, the conquistadors and KF best understand Christianity. Do you really want to go down that road?
No, and not only that, you are in violation of our local interpretation of Godwin’s law:
Godwin’s Law violation: The first party to imply that his discussion partners are comparable to Hitler, a current celebrity mass murderer, the KKK, or any similar entity is deemed to have both lost the argument and terminated his role in the discussion.
We generally try to avoid offering discussion services to such folk, as they have the effect of discouraging others.
Goodbye, and happily, there are blogs only a few doors down from us where that sort of thing is welcome. Feel free to tell your story to a crowd of sympathizers.
General note: We are similarly unreceptive to the practice of unlicensed psychiatry on unconsenting members of the public. Aside from being discourteous and a violation of privacy, it is an imposition on everyone’s time and patience. |
I guess Gordon(KairosFocus) Mullings went crying to Dense and Dreary.
My feet are getting cold with no socks. |
hrun0815May 17, 2016 at 10:13 am
Re #193:
Thanks for pointing this out, News. So you mean like implying that your discussion partner’s actions are responsible for a holocaust worse than the one committed by Nazi Germany? Or that atheists, subjectivists, materialists are comparable to Nazis?
I have a fun idea: Why don’t you go ahead and type ‘nazi’ or ‘holocaust’ into the search box in KF’s thread and see who is the first (and second, and third, and fourth) party who compares somebody to Nazis? |
| Quote | AletaMay 17, 2016 at 10:16 am
And you don’t ban kairosfocus for the steady stream of extreme accusations that he hurls at people he doesn’t agree with.
Why not? |
|
