GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (N.Wells @ April 24 2016,14:23) | | Therefore, how can the Templeton grant possibly be just a face-lift on "more of the same old, same old"????? |
I earlier showed the illustration for the EES which is clearly another variation of the usual natural selection based paradigm that can make no predictions at all in regards to "intelligence" that the theory I have predicts exists at multiple levels of biology. Having to accommodate the usual generalizations like "selection" and "drift" might work for a fuzzy view of what is happening but creates ambiguous variables that make computer modeling of reality impossible, but I'm sure it will lead to more all show and no go simulations that will at least keep the funding flowing.
BTW:
| Quote | | The Blyth Institute is an educational nonprofit organization which explores new avenues of exploration in biology, cognitive science, and engineering, focusing on the formal, semantic, and logical relationships within systems. The institute is named after Edward Blyth, a 19th century biologist whose works in this field remain influential today. |
http://www.blythinstitute.org/....ute....ute.org
Maybe you can see why I ended up being impressed by this institute.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
