Antievolution.org - Antievolution.org Discussion Board -Topic::A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin

Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

Posted: Jan. 09 2016,08:37

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Jan. 09 2016,09:00)

I mentioned the second peak because an action potential actually has two sources of ion current in the waveform, such as (red) Na and (green) K shown below. Where there is a delay before the K channels open its peak shows up later, or that's what I would expect anyway. And it's not necessary to have a negative resting potential as low as fast acting neurons.

www.physiologyweb.com/lecture_notes/neuronal_action_potential/neuronal_action_potential_important_features.html

What justifies calling an electrical potential in plant cells an "action potential"?

What you expect to be the case in any particular situation has already been seen to be a very good indicator that the reality is something else.
You are consistently, persistently, wrong, insofar as you are even coherent. Once in a rare while you are right by accident. Other than that, you gibber and you err. A behavioral "repertoire" containing 2 acts. Neither has any potential whatsoever.
[yes, I know word play will go right over Gary's head. It's not a high bar to cross.]

	Antievolution.org :: Antievolution.org Discussion Board The Critic's Resource on Antievolution