NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 04 2015,08:24) | | Getting out of the way of an approaching shock zone requires a good temporal sense of what will soon happen, in the future. |
As opposed to what will soon happen, in the past?
Your writing is execrable.
| Quote | This was added by alternating between current angular time (by default room angle is from 0 to 15) and the next angular time frame ahead. The places that will soon become a shock hazard periodically become a place to avoid. This sequential on and off signaling causes a (over time) temporal decision to be made. The same works for swarming bees. Scouts that found a possible new place to build a hive are one at a time allowed to dance out the location. This way each nesting option is one at a time considered in their actions, instead of all bees swarming to the first place found or to different locations.
http://io9.com/5866215....n-brain
There is no circuit deciding which possibility is best. In this case the virtual critter cannot divide and go separate ways. An appropriate action is taken just by repeatedly presenting (in any sequence) what must be acted upon. |
The rest dances between purple-prosed tautologies of the banal to mere word salad.
Learn to think. Then learn to write.
And just maybe pay attention to the concept of 'emergent behavior' which we've been hammering you with for ~9 years.
|
