stevestory
Posts: 13407
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote | 157
NickMatzke_UD
October 26, 2015 at 10:00 am
Mapou writes:
| Quote |
112
October 25, 2015 at 9:21 pm
VJT:
Re common design vs. common descent: I believe in both. They complement each other. However, common design alone cannot explain why we find switched-off genes coding for the production of egg yolks in human DNA. Only the hypothesis that humans are descended from an eggg-laying ancestor can explain that.
Why is that? Why could not a designer simply switch off an unneeded gene that is part of an existing (pre-designed) organism or genome? But then again, maybe early humans used to lay eggs. Maybe early humans were originally designed as egg-laying hermaphrodites. There is evidence in the book of Genesis and other ancient mythological stories for this. |
Adam and Eve laid eggs! You heard it here first, folks! |
linky
|
