EmperorZelos
Posts: 81
Joined: Oct. 2015
|
| Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 24 2015,13:06) | [quote=EmperorZelos,Oct. 24 2015,10:00] [quote=MrIntelligentDesign,Oct. 24 2015,08:53] | Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 23 2015,09:18) |
No, you assert it because they rejected your paper and quite fraknly. I HAVE readen your garbage and if I was a peer reviewer I'd reject it instantly, not because of the content but because it's written in a manner as if a 7 year old was the author. It's logically incoherent with little to no substance and lots of empty assertions. |
You were the one who said that the contents of my science books were not bad. Yes, I have science and you have nothing.
I am a free-lance scientist and I don't receive taxes and funds/grants. If I did, you could have the best grammars that you needed. But bad grammars could be fixed, bad science like yours could not. |
I say it IS bad, the content is bad, the structure is bad, therei s nothing good about your BOOKS, they are not science or anything.
You are not a scientist because scientists publish in peer reviewed journals. They don't cry like little babies when they are inept, they actually work on improving themselves so that they GET published.
|
