NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 21 2015,08:34) | | Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 21 2015,06:34) | | Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 21 2015,05:46) | | Quote (EmperorZelos @ Oct. 20 2015,11:49) | | Quote (NoName @ Oct. 20 2015,11:37) | The incompetence of Mr. Postrado may be one of nature's few self-evident truths.
It is so fundamental we may almost treat it as an axiom. |
It's not an axiom because it's demonstrable. He is a clear sufferer from Dunning-krüger effect.
I throw this out to all, why is it that this phenomenon seem to be so prevelent amongst engineers? That is that they so severely overestimate their capabilities compared to pure academics. |
You have no science since you have no replacement for my new discoveries..
You don't have even a clue about the real and universal intelligence!
Thus, you are nothing! |
You don't have any science because if it isn't peer reviewed and published in reputable journals, it isn't science no matter how much you cry to mommy that they are being unfair and not playing by your rules.
That is also fallacious reasoning, I don't need to replace yours to demonstrate it's false.
As for "having nothing", well let's see, bachelor degree, soon masters degree, then gonna go for PhD, gonna acctually do REAL research at that point that is published, looks like I got and aim to do much more than you do as it includes ONLY doing rationalizations of idiocy. |
I don't care about your academic status since you have no clue of the real and universal intelligence.
You knew, if you claim that you have science, you can easily smash my new discoveries with your replacement. But since you don't have, YOU ARE JUST TELLING a lie.
Be real! |
That's funny, given that several of your as-yet-unsupported, and entirely unsupportable, charges against my arguments were that I was not qualified, I did not have a science degree, etc.
As I've pointed out before, those are ad hominem attacks and thus irrelevant. I post as 'NoName' specifically to keep the focus on the matters at hand, not on the persons and personalities who make the various claims and challenges.
It does not take a replacement for your notions to show that they are wrong.
Insisting that it does is to lie.
Your notions are incoherent, contradictory, unsupported by evidence, irrational, and thus useless.
We understand them -- that is why we reject them.
It does not take a replacement to show the many errors, fallacies, and flaws of your silliness.
The only one on this thread who is not 'being real', the only one who is obviously telling lies, is you.
We have 30 pages of evidence supporting that view.
You have unsupported assertions and repeated shouts of "SHUT UP SHUT UP". That's all well and good for a lyric by the Residents. It is not science. It is not mature. It is not justified.
But it is your only hope. You lose.
According to you, losers can never win. You should give up now.
|
