Texas Teach
Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 17 2015,09:41) | | Quote (Texas Teach @ Oct. 17 2015,09:34) | | Fail, Gaulin. I didn't even mention natural selection. |
The premise of the theory is:
| Quote | | The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection. |
Your sad attempt at misdirection is duly noted. |
Why do you keep trying to use words, Gary? They obviously are too hard for you. Look at the the words you flopped in front of natural selection: such as. That indicates that natural selection is but one of a number of undirected processes that you think your "intelligent cause" is better than. You've offered zero evidence of that, but fine.
My point is that I am not talking about the things you think "intelligent cause" is better than. I want you to please list the "features" for which "intelligent cause" is not a better explanation. Your "premise" claims that "certain features...are best explained by intelligent cause".
Why only "certain features"? Why not all features? If it is all features, why the generalization "certain"? If it isn't all features, why won't you tell us which features aren't included?
Please answer these simple questions. The fate of Intelligent Design rests on your answers.
--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr
"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin
|
