NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 07 2015,18:47) | I should also add that the recent revision to the operational definition for intelligence was the result of needing to show where it connects to recent evidence from neuroscience, now modeled by the ID Lab 5 that works great when put together as described.
My having no problem at all getting complex animal behavior by just adding a relatively simple addressable network to what I had for decades been experimenting with speaks for itself in regards to how scientifically useful the model and theory actually is.
Trashing something like this is scientifically irresponsible. But that's what happens in a forum like this one. Trolls. |
This particular move has been dealt with repeatedly.
The fact, if it is actually a fact, that you can code systems that mimic the behavior of actual intelligences tells us exactly nothing about how the actual intelligence(s) in question work or are implemented.
Animals are not Von Neumann machines. All modern computers are. All programs rely on Von Neumann architectures. No animal possesses a Von Neumann architecture.
As to the matter at hand, to wit, muscle control systems, you remain wrong. Disproven. Undone by the evidence.
Deal with it.
You have no science, you are not doing science.
It is scientifically irresponsible to suggest otherwise.
|
