GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (dazz @ Oct. 04 2015,16:51) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 04 2015,16:44) | | Quote (dazz @ Oct. 04 2015,16:16) | | Quote | | From the lack of outrage over presenting a disembodied God as scientific evidence it's as though we might as well conclude that the "science defenders" see no problem with that |
where was a "disembodied God" presented as scientific evidence? where is that god you fucking asshole?
And how is ignoring you equivalent to seeing no problem with your arguments? |
Pardonne moi, for my grammar suggesting that you actually presented something. You are right, you presented nothing at all.
And the issue is not about ignoring me. The issue is about condoning unscientific bullshit, by ignoring you. |
I clearly presented you with a reasoned argument on why your crap excludes gods as intelligent agents.
So you have two options: retract your crap, or admit there are no gods |
The only religion I know of that needs a "disembodied" God is yours.
In world religions God is more of an everywhere and in everything including us force that does not need a material body like ours, cannot be "disembodied".
The theory is now into network models where the something to control is in the network where an entity can have shape and form but as in my network models seeing it requires showing as force vector map for electrochemical forces, from the behavior of matter, which are normally invisible to our eyes. The religious possibilities only increased, not decreased, for all religions that I know of except yours.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
