NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Oct. 03 2015,12:27) | | Quote (NoName @ Oct. 03 2015,11:14) | There are countless acts that count as intelligent yet lack some of your criteria. Notably, there are no muscular control systems of any sort involved in creating a new melody, modifying it mentally, crafting harmonies for it, transposing it to a new key, considering multiple timbres for it, etc.
Likewise for recognition of a previously heard melody. |
You are confusing what an intelligence is and how it works with what the said intelligence is able to do.
The dumbing down of science continues.. |
Bullshit.
It is clear and obvious that there is no muscle control system of any sort required for intelligence.
The confusion between what intelligence is and what it can do is yours.
You conflate the two and thus wind up with the erroneous condition of 'something to control' as a necessity for intelligence. It is not.
The dumbing down of science is your job, and you do it when you ignore the research about sensation and memory that blow your absurd oversimplified and erroneous generalization about 'sensory addressed ram' out of the water.
You do not know what intelligence is.
You do not have a definition or a set of necessary or sufficient conditions for intelligence.
Your work is riddle with errors, from bad sentence construction to bad generalizations to bad logic to complete dishonesty about your work, from start to finish.
As we all know far too well.
|
