MrIntelligentDesign
Posts: 405
Joined: Sep. 2015
|
| Quote (The whole truth @ Oct. 02 2015,06:03) | | Quote (MrIntelligentDesign @ Oct. 02 2015,02:55) | | Quote (The whole truth @ Oct. 02 2015,03:10) | Edgar Postrado said:
"ME: Because they talk natural phenomenon when they talked about intelligence."
So then, Edgar, is intelligence a supernatural phenomenon?
You ask us if we understand your OP, but what's there to understand? About all you've done so far is assert some arrogant claims without any evidence and a coherent explanation to support whatever it is that you're claiming. Apparently English isn't your main language and I'm trying to not hold that against you but I'm having a hard time trying to figure out what you're saying. And, you really should quit beating around the bush and get to the point.
You're pushing 'intelligent design'. How do you define 'intelligent design'? What evidence and coherent explanation do you have that supports the how, when, where, and why of 'intelligent design' by 'the designer'? And who or what is 'the designer'? |
1. So then, Edgar, is intelligence a supernatural phenomenon?
ME: No. Since they are both existing in the whole natural realm but in the entire natural realm, there are natural phenomena or naturen and intelligent phenomena or intellen.
2. You ask us if we understand your OP, but what's there to understand?
ME: I said that we can now categorize and differentiate an intellen to naturen. Do you understand this? I mean, there is a dividing line between natural phenomena or naturen and intelligent phenomena or intellen and that is what I've discovered. Do you understand this? |
No, I don't understand that. |
Which?
You don't understand my grammars
or you cannot accept my science?
|
