GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Sep. 14 2015,14:12) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 13 2015,17:48) | | Quote (Jim_Wynne @ Sep. 13 2015,16:29) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ Sep. 13 2015,16:03) | | You will not find a more biologically accurate model showing the basics of what neuroscientists have been discovering, which really came to life by adding to the ID Lab critter. |
I have no idea how a person who is as ignorant of the literature and the basics of science--any science--as you are could make such a statement.
Please share with us the models you've reviewed and the journals where we can find the underlying research papers. |
The vital papers are included in the Notes folder. The url of others that you will need are listed in comments of the source code.
Most of the neuroscience was earlier discussed in this thread. I have hundreds of other papers I saved in my browser but that would be going overboard and could take some time to list. It's basically the best of the recent Nobel Prize winners and Andre Fenton & Eduard Kelemen who wrote Dynamic Grouping of Hippocampal Neural Activity During Cognitive Control of Two Spatial Frames that provided the most clues about how the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex area of the brain works.
Without adding anything that needed it I got the same signal pair concordance ratios when working properly. While experimenting with it the ratio going way off happened while visibly not working right. The program now starts up showing that on the screen. I added the feature to make it easier to show how and why that varies, to help compare what happens in the model to what is explained in all literature that pertains to it. I let Andre know of new developments to the software. So far has not responded back to my request to let me know where I'm way off track by my having missed something I should have known about. I cannot speak for them and have no idea what their exact opinion is (I never asked for it) but at least I'm not in a vacuum where the greatest scientists in the world know nothing of me or have none that know what I'm up to quickly tell me to stop misrepresenting their work, where they felt it did. Feedback I got from Edvard Moser is that my navigational network (internal world model) work is good enough for the audience it's for.
If you can propose another reason for the ratios and know how it's wired in then let me know. Otherwise the model I have does fine achieving them along with incredibly complex behaviors for something that simple to model. So try to beat that. I want you to. |
Which models have you reviewed, and where can I find them and the associated research papers? (That was the original question.) |
You can start with all the models listed here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki....gorithm
I just got home from a long day at work and I'm not in the mood for spending the rest of it looking up all the models I ever studied over the past 40 years of my life just to please a crybaby.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
