NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Aug. 16 2015,14:47) | | Quote (N.Wells @ Aug. 15 2015,18:48) | | This is bad for your hypothesis. |
The only hypothesis that was being discussed was yours.
Claiming that it's somehow mine was another deception.
I am still curious though as to why you and others keep the hoax going even though it has been made clear that "The Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Does Not Refute Intelligent Design":
http://www.ideacenter.org/content........507 |
Gary, nothing 'refutes' "intelligent design" because there is no there, there. There is nothing to refute.
ID makes no positive argument(s).
ID presents no evidence.
Your swill is even worse, of course, not even counting as 'intelligent design'.
The only notions being discussed here are yours. Which are delusional, false to fact, incoherent, internally contradictory, etc.
You've been refuted, falsified, obliterated in every regard.
In your 8+ years on the web, you've convinced literally no one that your "work" has any merit other than as a target for derision.
And you know it.
|
