NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
As we have all seen countless times, with countless examples, your absurdist "theory" is not consistent with the evidence.
It has been falsified, at the foundations, with your false-to-fact insistence that any act, to be considered intelligent, must involve motor control systems.
This has the rather unfortunate consequence that generation of a theory can no longer be considered an intelligent act. The printer printing the written form of the theory, however, does count as intelligent.
You've gone so far wrong you can't even see right from where you are.
Also, do please note that you trumpet your ignorance of evolution and of biology by approving Chris B's formulation as materially different from what you take to be the standard evolutionary answer.
You then proceed to insert supposed premises that are not part of either form of the hypothesis.
Meanwhile, of course, you have no hypotheses at all.
You pathetic buffoon.
|
