JohnW
Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (CeilingCat @ July 07 2015,23:02) | I think we may be misunderestimating the dangers of gay connubialism. vjtorley quoted a reply timocrates made to "Ed Feser’s brilliantly written blog article, Marriage and the Matrix (June 29, 2015)".
Some important dangers Mr timocrates brings up in that reply: | Quote | 1. Social ostracism:
– In your workplace, where you are likely to be fired and not hired at all if you are known to have “controversial” views on homosexuality;
– You family. Friends stick out much longer than they will, but even they will become much, much more quiet and reserved and increasingly hesitant to help you.
3. School torture
– Kids will begin learning about sex and how two moms and two dads are a normal kind of family as early as 6
– Sex-ed will begin as early as Grade 6, including descriptions of oral sex
– Any child who at any time identifies with any sex will be accommodated, whether bathroom or locker room
And the final stage that is now happening in Canada, the Trannies.
Transgender people will increasingly agitate that society, government, institutions and businesses facilitate their lies. They will agitate that dating sites and services simply portray them as their chosen sex without any warning to normal, unsuspecting users of services.
That last line is arguably the scariest for single people, especially single young men. We all know how a man is likely to respond after finding out she isn’t actually a she at all – and with gender change surgeries now, this may come later. |
Ostracized by our families? And our friends?
Our children tortured in their schools?
Sex-ed in grade six?
Ruthless Trannies preying on our innocent youth?
Be vewy vewy careful! |
In ten years, Torley, Feser et al will be saying they supported gay marriage all along.
In twenty years, they'll be saying they're the ones who achieved it.
--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG
|
