JohnW
Posts: 3217
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (Woodbine @ May 18 2015,01:28) | | Quote | | No. But once ID is the accepted paradigm I am sure people will get right on it. |
Yeah, any day now.
In my opinion one of the most damning indictments of the ID movement is the absolute refusal to follow up their 'inference of design'. They bang on about how ID is just like archaeology - well, if all archaeologists did was point at potsherds and go home they might have a point.
The scientific discovery of the intelligent design of life should have been the catalyst for an explosion of activity. Who, what, where, why.....all those questions actual archaeologists are falling over themselves to answer.
But not ID.
The reason is obvious; through the Bible they already know everything there is to know about the designer. Further investigation is completely unnecessary and quite possibly heretical.
It's delicious. |
It's almost as though ID is just religious apologetics, and isn't really science at all...
--------------
Math is just a language of reality. Its a waste of time to know it. - Robert Byers
There isn't any probability that the letter d is in the word "mathematics"... The correct answer would be "not even 0" - JoeG
|
