paragwinn
Posts: 539
Joined: Mar. 2008
|
This was too good to pass up.
Joe G's "Sure-fire Steps For ID to Obtain Intellectual Superiority Over Evo-Mat-Atheism" as witnessed on this Sandwalk post: | Quote | Joe G Friday, May 15, 2015 3:06:00 PM
Earth to the scientifically illiterate:
The design inference is a top-down approach. That means first you determine if intelligent design is present and THEN, and only then, do you ask about the who, how, why, where and when. You don't even ask those questions until you have determined intelligent design is present. |
| Quote | Piotr Gąsiorowski Friday, May 15, 2015 3:39:00 PM
That means first you determine if intelligent design is present and THEN, and only then, do you ask about the who, how, why, where and when.
OK, so it has been established, to the IDiots' satisfaction, that life is intelligently designed. Fine. Now you can tell us the who, how, why, where and when. |
| Quote | Joe G Friday, May 15, 2015 3:48:00 PM
[snip -- paragwinn]
Now you can tell us the who, how, why, where and when.
No. But once ID is the accepted paradigm I am sure people will get right on it. |
| Quote | Piotr Gąsiorowski Friday, May 15, 2015 4:11:00 PM
Oh. The ACCEPTED PARADIGM.
It works the other way round, Joe. Research can't wait till you erect a new paradigm; it has be done first, or there will be no new paradigm. . .
|
| Quote | Joe G Friday, May 15, 2015 7:01:00 PM
Piotr, You are confused. The research confirms the design inference/ You are a cowardly amateur, piotr. You don't have a viable alternative to ID. |
I would cast this exchange in bronze if I could.
[eta: formatting adjustments]
--------------
All women build up a resistance [to male condescension]. Apparently, ID did not predict that. -Kristine 4-19-11
F/Ns to F/Ns to F/Ns etc. The whole thing is F/N ridiculous -Seversky on KF footnote fetish 8-20-11
Sigh. Really Bill? - Barry Arrington
|
