GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (Texas Teach @ May 14 2015,22:52) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 14 2015,19:40) | | Quote (Texas Teach @ May 14 2015,19:34) | Atoms = alive
See how stupid that is? (Probably not). |
I'm in no mood for your talking trash I never said. Asshole. |
Of course you did. You just never think about the consequences of the bullshit you make up. You tried to argue that because we study a thing that might have been a precursor to life as part of the story of life, we should call it the first living thing (and intelligent, for reasons only you seem to know). I just took your ridiculous logic a step farther and showed that, by your criteria, atoms must be alive.
RNA is part of living things, and some think it might have been a step on the road to living things, but it is no more a living thing than a water molecule is, and for the same reasons. You wouldn't look so foolish if you thought through the consequences of changing definitions to suit your bizarre whims. |
Then I will not bother trying to explain things that are clearly beyond the ability of this forum to comprehend.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
