Texas Teach
Posts: 2084 Joined: April 2007
|
Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 14 2015,19:14) | Quote (Texas Teach @ May 14 2015,18:30) | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 14 2015,18:25) | Quote (fnxtr @ May 13 2015,08:39) | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 13 2015,03:56) | Quote (Woodbine @ May 13 2015,01:09) | So, what were the 'first intelligent living things', Gary.
Be specific. |
It's in the theory and I don't have time to explain it all over again. Enough is enough. |
You don't have time to say "cnidarians" or "flatworms" or "space aliens" or "they're not here yet"?
Bullshit. |
From what science now has for evidence the theory predicts the first "intelligent living things" were RNA's that (as modern viruses still do today) used existing environmental chemistry (in self-replicating RNA systems this includes each other) as a host for replication. |
So RNAs (note the lack of apostrophe) are both living and intelligent? Got any evidence for either of those assertions? |
Like this?
From what science now has for evidence the theory predicts the first "intelligent living things" were RNAs that (as modern viruses still do today) used existing environmental chemistry (in self-replicating RNA systems this includes each other) as a host for replication.
Also: "Living thing(s)" = "Life" "RNA(s)" World = Origin Of "Life" science Therefore see Origin Of Life science for evidence of: "RNA(s)" = first "Living Thing(s)" And "theory predicts" is evidenced by studying the theory that made the prediction. All the evidence you need for "RNA(s)" = "intelligent" can be found there.
Theory Download Site |
By Gary logic: living things = made of atoms Atoms = alive
See how stupid that is? (Probably not).
And you have assertions in your not-a-theory, you have zero evidence. Show some data that RNA is intelligent or kindly stfu.
-------------- "Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr
"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin
|