Texas Teach
Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 14 2015,18:25) | | Quote (fnxtr @ May 13 2015,08:39) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ May 13 2015,03:56) | | Quote (Woodbine @ May 13 2015,01:09) | So, what were the 'first intelligent living things', Gary.
Be specific. |
It's in the theory and I don't have time to explain it all over again. Enough is enough. |
You don't have time to say "cnidarians" or "flatworms" or "space aliens" or "they're not here yet"?
Bullshit. |
From what science now has for evidence the theory predicts the first "intelligent living things" were RNA's that (as modern viruses still do today) used existing environmental chemistry (in self-replicating RNA systems this includes each other) as a host for replication. |
So RNAs (note the lack of apostrophe) are both living and intelligent? Got any evidence for either of those assertions?
--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr
"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin
|
