GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (stevestory @ April 28 2015,10:09) | | This is kinda like what Gary's program would be, if Gary wasn't a clueless lunatic: Evolution Lab |
That is not a computer model, or a theory of operation. Another what (maybe) came from what does not put the phrase "intelligent cause" into scientific context.
I have no need to try competing with what PBS and others already provide. At this point in time it's more like helping to pioneer a relatively new area of science where for all the goal ends up becoming to model living things in molecular level detail, with what can be fairly described as an ID Lab of the future.
My finding the need to stay consistent with existing theory writing procedures for "systems" can be useful information to someone who ends up not knowing where to even begin writing a "theory" for the system they have. This also supports what some of the most famous pioneers of systems biology have been describing about the framework of Darwinian theory not really working for them all that well. They are then accused of being science deniers. From my experience the problem is that system biology needs a theory writing structure designed for working with systems, while evolutionary biology needs what Charles Darwin wrote for theory. It's a "need to use the right tool" sort of thing, where what works is already there to use.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
