Tony M Nyphot
Posts: 491
Joined: June 2008
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 26 2015,16:34) | | Quote (Texas Teach @ April 26 2015,17:22) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 26 2015,17:12) | A theory is an explanation for how something works.
Period... |
That doesn't even match the definition you just quoted. You really are just impotently flailing about aren't you? |
Wikipedia is known for favoring what the anti-ID movement wants for embellishments, which in turn end up part of NSTA policy and definitions even though they are being deceptively used by political hacks who use them to take the definition out of context. |
Okay then, let's use the definition of a scientific theory and subsequent appraisal of Gary Gaulin's 40+ pages of mangled-English provided by a person Gary Gaulin has identified as a "cognitive science expert":
Scientific theories | Quote | | demand a coherent logical argument supported by pertinent evidence and [are] ideally consistent with the known scientific laws/theories in order [to view] a theory as scientific...You [GARY] singularly fail in this regard and hence I consider your effort unscientific. |
--------------
"I, OTOH, am an underachiever...I either pee my pants or faint dead away..." FTK
"You could always wrap fresh fish in the paper you publish it on, though, and sell that." - Field Man on how to find value in Gary Gaulin's real-science "theory"
|
