RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
Texas Teach



Posts: 2084
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: April 26 2015,16:46   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 26 2015,16:34)
The following is a perfect description of my scientific work that has for many years kept me up late at night running experiments and reading the latest research information in order to help substantiate my explanation for how intelligence works:

Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.


Science teachers need to beware of the definition being taken out of context by those who believe the description of the theory writing process is instead describing a tribunal that dictates whether a theory is a theory or not. In reality a theory is either useful or it's not, and where it's just plain wrong it's a "failed theory" that remains a theory even where totally bogus.

There is no scientific need at all for any of the embellishments that are being argued are necessary. They are only necessary to those who want to make it appear that they have the authority to dismiss then discredit theory, before they even test it. Not being able to understand what I'm talking about while complaining about terminology they are not used to is only a good indication of their not being able to fairly judge the theory.

Your nonsense isn't well-substantiated, it doesn't explain anything (because it's written in gibberish), it has nothing to do with the natural world because you refuse to ground it there (preferring a fantasy video game), it wasn't acquired through the scientific method, it hasn't been repeated tested (because multiple runs of your video game don't actually test your "theory"), it's never been confirmed by anyone (having been roundly rejected by everyone but you), and no one, especially you, has ever seen anything like what you imagine in either observations or experiments.  Doesn't it hurt to fail so hard in every possible way?

--------------
"Creationists think everything Genesis says is true. I don't even think Phil Collins is a good drummer." --J. Carr

"I suspect that the English grammar books where you live are outdated" --G. Gaulin

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]