RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Official Uncommonly Dense Discussion Thread< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
dhogaza



Posts: 525
Joined: Feb. 2006

(Permalink) Posted: July 08 2006,12:10   

Johnnyb has our number:
Quote
If one decides to argue against ID by saying that all of the arguments boil down to “it looks designed therefore it must be designed”, one must then argue against _any_ scientific inference or deduction. You could just as well argue that a “temperature inference” from a thermometer is invalid because “it looks hot therefore it must be hot”.

Maybe not, though, because when I read a thermometer I read the scale.  I don't look to see if it "looks hot".  Johnnyb needs a remedial thermometer reading class, perhaps? :)

  
  29999 replies since Jan. 16 2006,11:43 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (1000) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]