GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
From what I can gather a group of evolutionary biologists are using the public schools to teach an Avida based Darwinian theory that misrepresents what is actually going on in “cognitive science” and what cognitive scientists are working on. With the Google search engine now taking a "best guess" all that I have been explaining is already here anyway, including in what has been described as superhuman intelligence "future robot overlords" for us to welcome and/or beware of.
Instead of objective theory that systematically explains why IBM Watson and other systems indeed scientifically qualify as “intelligent” a branch of evolutionary biology is teaching subjective methods where unintelligent things like reaching a goal is good enough of a metric to use as a qualifier, even though such generalizations do not in reality work for those who actually model intelligence (cognitive scientists). Not even the Watson or Google machine intelligence now all around us right now wants anyone to take credit away from their meeting the systematic requirements that also makes sense along with what Arnold Trehub and David Heiserman explained about the basic systematic features of intelligence.
The need to misrepresent my work could be the tip of an iceberg that's in the way of scientific progress now being made in all of cognitive science. Something way bigger than me, where I'm just one of the passengers who needs to help keep watch for those in our way. I'll from here shout out the above alarm to at least cause Wesley to have to rearrange the deck chairs of what they are aboard, while I further work on the computer model that makes it possible for others elsewhere to not have to stop there.
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
