RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
KevinB



Posts: 525
Joined: April 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Mar. 10 2015,08:56   

Quote (Bob O'H @ Mar. 10 2015,07:23)
Quote (KevinB @ Mar. 09 2015,12:19)
 
Quote (Zachriel @ Mar. 09 2015,09:29)
   
Quote (JohnW @ Mar. 06 2015,13:05)
I've been trying to kick the Uncommonly Dense habit.  But this is just too awesome:
         
Quote
79
Box March 5, 2015 at 8:02 am
         
Quote
Zachriel: Drawing ten straight flushes in a row from a fair, well-shuffled deck is not plausible (…)

Indeed. And why is not plausible? Exactly because of the second law, which is all about probability.

Nineteen minutes later:
         
Quote
82
Box March 5, 2015 at 8:21 am
         
Quote
Zach: The odds of a royal flush are not an example of thermodynamics.

True. However it’s totally irrelevant, because who said they are? You are not playing stupid with me now or what?

Z: The caloric cost of shuffling and dealing and playing of cards are paid for by the alcohol.



That's your thermodynamics for ya!

"Intelligent Design" is, of course, based on the use of a marked deck.

Let's employ a card sharp metaphor.....

"Canada Dry" O'Leary?
"Pair of Sevens" BA?
Montserrat Jim?
"Doc Bill" Dembski?

Now, who's got the deck with 5 aces? The one that's all jokers? The trick deck that always cuts at the Queen of Spades?

And of course UD's version of Canada Bill Jones' Law..

"A ban hammer beats four aces"

You missed out the question of how many cards in their decks: clearly it's less than 52.

It's an Aleister Crowley Thoth Tarot deck.

  
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]