OgreMkV
Posts: 3668
Joined: Oct. 2009
|
| Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 11 2015,11:28) | | Quote (OgreMkV @ Feb. 11 2015,10:54) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 11 2015,09:11) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 11 2015,09:05) | | When it was repeatedly, and independently, demonstrated to Joe that one frequency can in fact have more than one wavelength, he runs away like a bully after his first bloody nose. |
Yes, if you change the CONSTANT, like a dick, you can show many different things. However using the SAME CONSTANT, what I said stands. |
This is exactly what I predicted.
You didn't say that originally. Therefore, your claim is wrong.
I see you back pedaling and trying to redirect. But your original claim is wrong and you know it.
P.S. This is EXACTLY the same thing you did to me four pages ago. Now, you can either apologize and admit I was correct or be judged as a hypocrite. I think I can predict which way you'll go. You'll do anything to prevent having to admit you're wrong. |
LoL! Kevin, it was so obvious and that is why I kept asking for examples so I could show you were being anal retentive dickheads.
OTOH climate change has to take into account the history of the earth because that very history calls into question the chicken-little alarmists. The climate changes, that is what it does and will do so regardless of any input from us. |
And when we're talking about human caused climate change, you can really only talk about the time period when humans as a technological species existed.
Normal people understand this.
You are still a climate denier, which is odd, because you agree that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and you know that humans are dumping gigatons of CO2 into the atmosphere. And yet, you don't think that humans cause climate change.
You're weird.
--------------
Ignored by those who can't provide evidence for their claims.
http://skepticink.com/smilodo....retreat
|
