Acartia_Bogart
Posts: 2927
Joined: Sep. 2014
|
| Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 10 2015,06:36) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 06 2015,13:29) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 06 2015,10:58) | | Quote (Acartia_Bogart @ Feb. 06 2015,10:49) | Hi Joe. When are you going to publish your proof that Cantor was wrong about set theory? I am sure that we are all looking forward to it.
Will it be a companion piece to your published proof that frequency = wavelength? |
Show me a frequency that has more than one wavelength. Show me a wavelength that has more than one frequency.
Cantor was ignorant about relativity and basic set subtraction proves there is a difference between countably infinite sets.
Don't blame me because you are too dim to grasp that. |
Joe. You made a statement several weeks ago that wavelength equals frequency, a self-evidently incorrect statement. Everyone, including myself, makes these types of innocent misstatements on occasion but a sane and rational person would admit that they were mistaken when it is pointed out to them. Would you like to tell the good people here how you reacted to this? (no need to answer this question. It is rhetorical).
As well, in-between calling Jerrad every abusive name in the book on your blog, you claimed that you have proven that Cantor is wrong. All I asked was when you planned to publish this proof. Let me rephrase that so that even you can understand it. It will only require a one word answer. Are you planning to publish your proof that Cantor was wrong? As Gordon (KairosFocus) Mullings would say, your answer will be very telling. |
OK so you can't show us a frequency that has more than one wavelength. Do you have any evidence that what I said is incorrect? Can you even try to make a case to that effect? |
Do you have any evidence that what I said is incorrect?
Please solve for X, where X = frequency:
2 meters = X
Please show your math.
|
