Joe G
Posts: 12011
Joined: July 2007
|
| Quote (OgreMkV @ Feb. 10 2015,10:22) | | Quote (Joe G @ Feb. 10 2015,10:08) | So, we FINALLY get an understanding of your blind watchmaker evolution idea.
Why don't you just call it materialistic evolution?
Since you don't agree with the MATERIALISTIC part of evolution and agree with all other parts of evolution, the ONLY determining factor would be a designer.
Which means that, unlike what ID claims, the only thing that will help ID become reality is having a designer.
So who/what is the designer and what's the evidence for it (hint, using ID as evidence for a D is circular logic, so don't do that OK)?
Thanks for another own goal Joey. |
And more evidence that Kevin is an ignorant asshole- I posted all of that in my opening post of our debate and Kevin says today that he Finally gets an understanding of "my" blind watchmaker idea. April of 2011, Kevin. You are only 3+ years behind...[/quote]
Meh... so all those times I asked, instead of being an asshole, you could have just said "here's the link" and quoted it. But no, you had to wait.
The evidence for design is NOT evidence for a designer. Why? Because the evidence for design and the evidence for evolution are EXACTLY THE SAME.
That's what you clowns don't get. You absolutely must accept all the aspects of evolution because there is so much evidence in support. So you say that ID is not anti-evolution, ID is theistic evolution then.
But there's no evidence of a designer that isn't related to the "design", which you haven't shown to be any different from what's expected in evolution.
Circular logic.
What's the evidence for the designer?
The design?
How do we know it's designed?
Because only the designer can do it?
Who's the designer?
We don't talk about that.
So what's the evidence for the designer? |
LoL! Your ignorance while amusing just proves you are ignorant.
If you had some evidence that unguided evolution was up to the task ID would be dead. You have nothing. Yours isn't even a theory. It doesn't produce any testable hypotheses. There isn't anything "expected" from unguided evolution. You are just an ignorant equivocator.
BTW ID is NOT theistic evolution. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Tell us Kevin, do we need to know the intelligent designer BEFORE determining intelligent design is present? Or does that always come after we determine ID is present?
--------------
"Facts are Stupid"- Timothy Horton aka Occam's Afterbirth
"Genetic mutations aren't mistakes"-ID and Timothy Horton
Whales do not have tails. Water turns to ice via a molecular code- Acartia bogart, TARD
YEC is more coherent than materialism and it's bastard child, evolutionism
|
