GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (Lethean @ Feb. 10 2015,00:26) | Gary, I've riffled around in your underwear drawer and discovered a text file chock full of predictions you've derived from your theory. I took the liberty of enumerating them and one in particular has piqued my curiosity.
| Quote | | #20 - What triggers sexual arousal is not "hard wired" in neurons as an image, it has a molecular origin with feedback circuitry that is more or less able to sense what the eyes and brain are seeing |
I was hoping you could expand on this. Could you share the moment you had this epiphany, and the train of scientific thought and reasoning that led to this prediction ? |
As a matter of fact that is part of the 24/7 causation pathway the Conclusion is explaining, which needs to be in the Introduction. It would then be possible to say that in other words, by doing a better job at the start of explaining how the system works. I could then take out the sentence you found that leaves that part mostly unexplained until somewhat the very end where added detail is easy to miss mixed in.
Once again writing that can make you say "What?" is made gone for you by not trying to sort out a Theory Of Operation like a research paper. Brain related detail found on Wikipedia is not needed for theory either, which would simplify the Speciation section. And what's in the Speciation section then mostly goes with the Molecular Intelligence section. It might help to combine that information too. Thoughts?
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
