RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: A Separate Thread for Gary Gaulin, As big as the poop that does not look< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
NoName



Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013

(Permalink) Posted: Feb. 08 2015,08:02   

Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 07 2015,19:16)
 
Quote (Texas Teach @ Feb. 07 2015,08:50)
See my little prepositional phrase there in bold?  See how it doesn't point to your "theory"?

Yes, not pointing to the theory that is supposed to be under discussion made it too low a priority for me to rush to answer. But the press rebuild I was focused on worked!

Ahem.  The press rebuild is also not the topic that is supposed to be under discussion.  Odd how many times you originate such diversions.  One might almost think you're not interested in actually discussing your "theory."

 
Quote
... I am though keeping up with what genuinely needs updating. A couple of days ago I changed all the "good guess" phrases to "best guess" to be consistent with what the Google search likes when unsure of what video you're searching for. ...

This from the man who less than a week ago said:
Quote (GaryGaulin @ Feb. 03 2015,21:08)

Perhaps you did not notice that I almost entirely stopped updating the theory. The only new plans I have considered over the past few months is to delete it and all backups from the internet and my computer, leave one last message in this forum explaining why I don't care anymore, then never return to this forum ever again.

I don't know for sure what your game is but since I am not trying to become a career scientist I now have no plans to publish it in any science journal. The industry already made it clear that such a theory is not welcomed and will not even be reviewed so I would almost certainly only waste more of my life by trying.

If the best this forum and others like it can do is throw insults after I tried to explain something so valuable then they deserve nothing from me, ever again..


As I have pointed out before, this last paragraph is massively dishonest.  This  and other forums have done substantially more than throw insults.  Yes, plenty of insults have been flung, but generally only after all other attempts to engage you on the content and meaning of your 'theory' have failed.  We've tried to discuss your 'theory', you've failed to engage.  Consistently, persistently, and for coming up on 7 or more years now.

How can we miss you if you won't go away?

  
  18634 replies since Oct. 31 2012,02:32 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (622) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]