NoName
Posts: 2729
Joined: Mar. 2013
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Jan. 27 2015,17:51) | I ended up needing to go into more detail about what makes the ID model scientifically unique:
http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology....-544517
I also have to elaborate on my statement "What happens next at UD is up to those who are there, with whatever they ultimately do not much mattering to science." by saying that it is possbile for a scientifically important discovery to be made by someone at UD, but where the theory were a person it would say something like "well of course and it's about time you discovered that". A part of the theory is by virtue of its core logic just there, does not need someone at UD to notice something to be true it will test true on its own. |
Oh, your "theory" is both unique and true. Tragically (for you), where it is unique it is emphatically not true. In those very few cases where it is true, it barely rises to the level of banal and inconsequential.
Your "theory" -- or those minuscule bits where such is possible -- has been tested, and found to be false.
Blatantly, irredeemably, irremediably false.
How about you address some of the open questions you've been running from for years?
|
