N.Wells
Posts: 1836
Joined: Oct. 2005
|
| Quote (GaryGaulin @ Dec. 12 2014,03:26) | | Quote (Woodbine @ Dec. 11 2014,02:39) | Hi, Gary.
Another year over and your revolutionary ideas are still being completely ignored; even by the good folk at Uncommonly Dense! That has to sting a bit.
So what's in store for 2015? |
As you probably sensed from yesterday's response I'm very well outraged. But not by what's happening at UD where it's like I earlier said about the best thing is for what I have to fit in like all the rest, without anyone objecting to it. What stings is from this forum. Mostly the bullying on behalf of a punishing academic authority that expects at least an .edu at the end of my email address or have to be ignored.
As evidenced by recent riots in the US the loss of public trust in institutions that control society can be a very dangerous thing. And at this time a forum like this one is nothing less than a national security risk. |
You don't get it. The lack of an edu after your email is irrelevant. (Darwin wouldn't have had one, had they existed back then.) What you need, at minimum, to be taken seriously is:
1) Understand the basics of what you are criticizing,
2) Propose something that makes sense,
3) Either use terminology in standard ways or provide intelligible redefinitions, including operational definitions
4) Provide some supporting evidence and/or some ways to test your ideas.
Instead, you have a putrid pile of poorly written wishful thinking plus a program that is not relevant to the claims that you make for it.
If you are truly concerned about national security, follow the scientific method rather than crapping all over it, because the scientific method is the foundation of a modern technological society.
|
