RSS 2.0 Feed

» Welcome Guest Log In :: Register

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   
  Topic: Uncommonly Dense Thread 5, Return To Teh Dingbat Buffet< Next Oldest | Next Newest >  
sparc



Posts: 2088
Joined: April 2007

(Permalink) Posted: June 28 2014,23:40   

Quote (keiths @ June 26 2014,16:11)
From that thread:
 
Quote (BM40 @ June 25 2014, 9:37 pm)
I don’t understand why Dembski, Meyer, Luskin et al. rest on their laurels and never referred to your work. Thus, I would appreciate if the DI would offer you the chance to present your concepts during their next summer school or if they would invite you to the next ID Alaskan cruise.

BM40 -- sock or sap?

KF misses the point:  
Quote

44 kairosfocus June 28, 2014 at 5:23 am
F/N: Why am I underscoring the studious silence of objectors to the design inference as manifested in the significance of FSCO/I?

Precisely because it is the pivot of the real issue.

Or would he count Dembski, Meyer, Luskin et al. as objectors to the design inference?

--------------
"[...] the type of information we find in living systems is beyond the creative means of purely material processes [...] Who or what is such an ultimate source of information? [...] from a theistic perspective, such an information source would presumably have to be God."

- William Dembski -

   
  15792 replies since Dec. 29 2013,11:01 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >  

Pages: (527) < [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... >   


Track this topic Email this topic Print this topic

[ Read the Board Rules ] | [Useful Links] | [Evolving Designs]