GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (N.Wells @ April 26 2014,19:54) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 26 2014,19:09) | | Quote (N.Wells @ April 26 2014,19:00) | | John Endler, 1986, Natural Selection in the Wild, Princeton, is another nice book on the topic that provides long-existing answers to Gary's criticisms and concerns, from back before Gary raised them. |
Apparently you did not even notice that I copy/pasted what NoName said then inserted "natural selection" in place of "molecular intelligence".  |
Say what? Of course I noticed that. I was going to throw in an additional insult about your frequent pitiful inability to do anything but try to mirror complaints levelled at your nonsense, but it seemed like NoName had covered that nicely with his comment about your clueless reach for parallelism, so I left it alone and just gave you citations to cover your ignorance about natural selection. However, consider it reinstated.
I reiterate that you would benefit by reading Nowak's discussion of Learning Theory (theory about learning, not how to learn a theory). |
I'm not excited by math based AI type statistical methods that I earlier saw after looking up what they teach. It's easily possible I missed something, but in neuroscience the "HMAX" is now the most popular object recognition model:
Allen Institute - Lecture 10: Learning in the cortex
Have you studied this yet?
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
