GaryGaulin
Posts: 5385
Joined: Oct. 2012
|
| Quote (N.Wells @ April 26 2014,14:23) | | Quote (GaryGaulin @ April 26 2014,13:56) | | Quote (N.Wells @ April 26 2014,13:21) | | Also, you still haven't answered NoName's questions. |
Then answer mine: How does natural and artificial selection differ from, or go above and beyond, the standard laws of chemistry and physics?
I want to see how you would answer that equivalent question. |
A) BS, we asked first. Quit evading.
B) NoName gave you a great answer |
YOU are the one who insists there is such a thing as 'natural selection', which is either a banal claim of no interest whatsoever, or requires something above and beyond the standard laws of chemistry and physics.
And thus, an answer to the question is incumbent upon you.
Which is it?
And if it is what you've been implying up to now, what is it?
--------------
The theory of intelligent design holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
|
