Ptaylor
Posts: 1180
Joined: Aug. 2006
|
| Quote (Occam's Aftershave @ Mar. 20 2014,07:07) |
OK, which of you is Henry Crun? |
Whoever you are you've sure worked Mapou into a lather:
| Quote | 55
MapouMarch 19, 2014 at 3:01 pm
| Quote | Crun @52:
Hopelessly wrong. A red shift of 4 corresponds to a recession velocity of about 0.92 of the speed of light in vacuo. And your explosion issue is also grossly incorrect. The Big Bang isn t a bomb going off that was always an ironic sneer its a massive and rapid expansion from a hot dense state, more like a sudden inflation of a balloon . Space isnt just an abstract either, its space-time and it comes with real physical characteristics.
If you want to write about this stuff with any credibility, take a course. |
More pomposity and deceit. You people are a bunch of con artists and you got nothing of value to teach. You are weavers of lies and deception. You are about as ignorant about the cosmos and its origin as the man on the street.
The .92 C velocity is just a piece of turd that some jackass in the physics community pulled out of his asteroid orifice. It was obtained by applying Special Relativity formulas to the redshift measurements. The actual truth is that relativistic corrections are already inherent in the redshift (as per relativity) and applying it after the measurement is about as deceitful and backasswards as one can get.
Your point about spacetime being some physical entity is also based on total ignorance. The truth is that nothing can move in spacetime. Go learn your own crappy Star Trek voodoo physics.
PS. No need for you to reply, Crun. I cant stand throwing my pearls at swines. |
UD link
Have to love the "No need for you to reply" bit.
--------------
We no longer say: “Another day; another bad day for Darwinism.” We now say: “Another day since the time Darwinism was disproved.”
-PaV, Uncommon Descent, 19 June 2016
|
